I hope this message finds you well. When you talk about the idea of "strong leadership," I think you want to bring some more of the history in there. How was Washington a strong leader? What did he do that was so unique? How did he provide the will to win, the desire for success? I feel that more needs to be given according to these ideas and more history should be present. The blogging idea is there. The blogging voice is there, but the historical analysis is needed. Bring the history into this and you are set (Specific examples, details, reference points from the history.)
All best.
I think that you need to lay out a clearer case as to how the idea of blogging is fundamentally more efficient and more worthwhile than traditional writing. It's hinted, but not really clearly stated. I think that this is needed. Question: What can we do with blogging that we could not do with traditional writing. This might be something to think about as you, yourself, blog away. All best." ---- Mr. Kannan
Thank you man, I will look over the posts and threw my blog and make sure you suggestions go to the right place. I didn't understand that we needed to put facts about it I thought you were asking for us to talk about our thoughts on it. But I guess that a little follow up on my statement wouldn't hurt. And I will go back and make sure the questions are answered
"Brian this is awesome now be a man and be a man" ---Sam
Samuel, I am a man. A big man.
No comments:
Post a Comment